Skip to main content
Glama
valmiremini

bexio-mcp

by valmiremini

Search invoices

bexio_search_invoices

Search invoices by field criteria like contact name, email, or status. Filter results with operators such as equals, like, or in.

Instructions

Search invoices with field criteria (POST /2.0/kb_invoice/search).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax number of records (bexio default 500).
offsetNoNumber of records to skip.
criteriaYesList of field/value/criteria filters (AND-combined).
order_byNoField to order by, e.g. `id_desc` or `name_1`.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, rate limits, or potential side effects. The POST method implies data retrieval but no further details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks structure. It does not front-load key information or add any value beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is incomplete for effective use. It does not describe the return format, pagination behavior, or any prerequisites. Given 4 parameters and no output schema, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., 'field criteria' is already explained in the criteria parameter description).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (search), resource (invoices), and method (with field criteria). It distinguishes from bexio_list_invoices which likely lacks filtering capabilities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus siblings like bexio_list_invoices or bexio_get_invoice. The description does not mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/valmiremini/bexio-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server