voicebox_update_generation_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It only states that the tool updates settings and performs a partial update. It does not disclose side effects, permissions, reversibility, or other behavioral traits. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short, front-loaded sentences. Every phrase is necessary and adds value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high schema coverage (100%) and presence of an output schema, the description adequately covers the tool's purpose and behavior for a simple settings update. It could mention return values or confirm success, but the output schema compensates. Overall, it is complete enough for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents each parameter (e.g., default_engine, default_language). The tool description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the partial update hint. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description does not significantly enhance understanding of parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool updates global generation settings, using specific verb 'Update' and resource 'global generation settings'. It distinguishes from siblings like voicebox_get_generation_settings (retrieves) and other update tools (e.g., update_capture_settings) by specifying 'global' scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'Only provided fields are changed', indicating a partial update behavior. However, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to update vs. get settings) or provide exclusions. The guideline is implied but not comprehensive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.