voicebox_toggle_favorite

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose what happens on success, whether it returns the new status, or if it errors on non-existent generation. The term 'toggle' implies a state change, but no details on side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence, no filler, perfectly concise for a simple toggle operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and presence of an output schema (assumed to describe return value), the description is minimally complete. It could mention that the tool returns the new favorite status, but not required.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with description 'The generation ID.', and the tool description adds no additional meaning beyond that. The parameter is simple and self-explanatory, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it toggles the favorite status of a generation, with a specific verb and resource. However, it could be more precise by indicating what the toggle operation does (e.g., adds/removes a favorite flag). It distinguishes from siblings like 'delete_generation' which are destructive.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, the agent might need to know if there is a separate tool to explicitly set favorite status. The description does not mention prerequisites like the generation must exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.