voicebox_get_generation_settings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the behavioral burden. It indicates a read-only operation ('Get') with no side effects, which is adequate for this simple getter. However, it does not disclose what the response contains (though an output schema exists) or any potential errors. The transparency is acceptable but not enhanced beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the key information. Every word is essential, and there is no redundancy or extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no parameters and an output schema exists (handling return format), the description sufficiently explains the tool's purpose and scope. It is complete for a simple getter among many siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so schema coverage is trivially 100%. The description adds no parameter details because there are none. According to the scoring guide, zero parameters merit a baseline score of 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves global generation settings (defaults for all generations). It uses a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'global generation settings', which distinguishes it from related tools like voicebox_get_capture_settings and voicebox_update_generation_settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving default settings, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., voicebox_get_capture_settings for capture-specific settings or voicebox_update_generation_settings for modifications). No when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.