Skip to main content
Glama

Get e-Invoice Archive from SPV

get_einvoice_archive
Read-onlyIdempotent

Download the e-Invoice archive (XML) from Romania's SPV system for a previously submitted invoice by providing its series name and number.

Instructions

Downloads the e-Invoice archive (XML) from Romania's SPV system via GET /api/docs/einvoice. The invoice must have been previously submitted to SPV. Returns the SPV archive data for the specified invoice.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
seriesNameYesInvoice series name (e.g. FCT)
numberYesInvoice number
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description's mention of 'downloads' and 'GET' adds context but not beyond what annotations imply. No edge cases or error behavior described, but annotations cover safety profile.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero wasted words. Front-loaded with the core action and method. Efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description provides the key behavioral context (precondition, data format). Lacks details on error responses but is otherwise sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters (seriesName and number). The tool description does not add further parameter semantics, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool downloads an e-Invoice archive (XML) from Romania's SPV system via a specific API endpoint. Verb+resource is specific and distinguishes it from siblings like create_einvoice (submission) and get_document (document retrieval).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a precondition: invoice must have been previously submitted to SPV. However, it does not explicitly exclude cases when not to use or name alternatives, leaving the agent to infer usage context from sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/valentinludu/oblio-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server