execute_tutorial_steps

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses the default non-destructive behavior (review only) and the need for explicit confirmation to execute. Given no annotations, this provides good safety context, though it doesn't detail permissions or rollback.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with a safety note. Front-loaded purpose, then behavior. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, parameters, and safety. Output schema likely explains return, so not needed. However, lacks details on the execution outcome or integration steps with watch_and_analyze.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds value by explaining steps_json as the full analysis field from watch_and_analyze and confirming the safety role of confirm. Exceeds baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool reviews or executes tutorial steps from watch_and_analyze. Distinguishes from siblings by referencing its prerequisite tool and describing its dual mode (review/execute).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly instructs when to use confirm=false (review) vs confirm=true (execute after review). Provides a clear safety guideline, making it easy for the agent to decide usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.