execute_tutorial_steps

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description explains the two modes (review vs execute) and safety, but does not disclose what execution entails (e.g., actions performed, reversibility, or effect on system state).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no fluff, front-loaded purpose, safety instruction immediately following. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple tool with 2 params and output schema; description covers the two modes and safety. Could mention prerequisite of watch_and_analyze more explicitly, but schema implies it via steps_json description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and the description adds no new information beyond what the schema already provides for both parameters, maintaining baseline without enhancement.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool is for reviewing or executing tutorial steps extracted by watch_and_analyze, distinguishing it from sibling tools that focus on video analysis or transcription.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the tool is used after watch_and_analyze and provides explicit safety guidance on when to set confirm=false vs true, though it could explicitly state the prerequisite.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.