gom-deepwater-radar
Related Servers
Alternatives to gom-deepwater-radar
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that gives LLMs access to 70 petroleum engineering tools for well logs, decline curves, PVT, drilling, economics, and more.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server that drives OpendTect headlessly for SEG‑Y import, 3D horizon auto‑tracking, ASCII export, and horizon‑agreement scoring.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceModel Context Protocol (MCP) server offering rapid domain appraisal heuristics and secondary marketplace listing strategies243 npmMIT
petropt/petro-mcpprivate
AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives LLMs access to petroleum engineering data and tools. Parse well logs, query production data, fit decline curves, calculate EUR, and run nodal analysis -- all through natural language with any MCP-compatible AI assistant.831MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server wrapping worldmonitor global intelligence dashboard, exposing 140 tools across 32 services for live market, geopolitical, military, cyber, climate, and supply chain data.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides real-world intelligence including macroeconomics, climate, disasters, aviation, trade, and country data from globally trusted open APIs with no proprietary subscriptions required.1129 npm1MIT
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: regulatory classification, protraction-area lookup, and tieback economics. There is no overlap in the resource or action being targeted, so an agent can easily select the right tool.
All names use snake_case and are descriptive, but the first tool lacks an action verb and instead leads with an agency/acronym, while the other two follow a verb-noun pattern. The inconsistency is minor and does not impair readability.
Three tools are well-scoped for a focused deepwater analysis server, and each tool covers a distinct analytical dimension. The count is small but not trivially thin, given the specificity of the domain.
The surface covers regulatory classification, geological area lookup, and tieback economics, but it lacks direct well, platform, pipeline, or production-data access that a 'deepwater radar' user might reasonably expect. These gaps are notable though workable for the three supported workflows.