gom-deepwater-radar
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| bsee_hpht_regulatory_classifierB | Classifies Gulf of Mexico deepwater wells under BSEE NTL 2019-G03 and API 17TR8 guidelines, determining whether 20,000 PSI Tier-1 regulations, Independent Third-Party (I3P) verification, and Certified Verification Agent (CVA) approvals are legally triggered. |
| lookup_gom_protraction_areaA | Looks up BOEM Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) deepwater protraction areas in the Gulf of Mexico (MC, GC, WR, KC, AC, VK, AT), returning water depths, geological Wilcox/Miocene trends, and flagship host platform hubs. |
| estimate_tieback_economicsA | Evaluates subsea tieback capital expenditures (CAPEX), breakeven oil prices ($25-$35/bbl), and flow assurance distance thresholds versus standalone greenfield floating production units (FPUs). |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: regulatory classification, protraction-area lookup, and tieback economics. There is no overlap in the resource or action being targeted, so an agent can easily select the right tool.
All names use snake_case and are descriptive, but the first tool lacks an action verb and instead leads with an agency/acronym, while the other two follow a verb-noun pattern. The inconsistency is minor and does not impair readability.
Three tools are well-scoped for a focused deepwater analysis server, and each tool covers a distinct analytical dimension. The count is small but not trivially thin, given the specificity of the domain.
The surface covers regulatory classification, geological area lookup, and tieback economics, but it lacks direct well, platform, pipeline, or production-data access that a 'deepwater radar' user might reasonably expect. These gaps are notable though workable for the three supported workflows.