get_version_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what it returns, or any side effects. The verb 'get' implies a read operation, but this is not explicit, and no additional behavioral detail is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but consists of filler ('Premiere Pro expanded operation') that does not add value. It is not a properly structured sentence and fails to communicate necessary information efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with no parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should clarify what version info is returned. It does not, leaving the agent to infer that it returns Premiere Pro version, but with no explicit detail. The description is inadequate as the sole source of context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the schema is empty (with additionalProperties true). Per the baseline for zero parameters, the description is not required to add parameter semantics. It does not need to compensate for any missing schema details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description repeats the resource ('get version info') with a generic prefix 'Premiere Pro expanded operation.' It states the verb and resource but gives no detail on what 'version info' includes (e.g., application version, project version). It is not misleading but adds little beyond the tool's name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While there are no obvious sibling tools for version retrieval, the description offers no context on use cases or when this would be the appropriate choice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.