Get saved view

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds useful context beyond those annotations by revealing the return payload: the saved view includes its filter rules, which is the key behavioral detail for callers.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, well-ordered sentence delivers the resource, its key content, and the reason it matters without any filler. Every part of the description earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter, read-only getter with strong annotations, the description covers what is returned and why it is useful. It omits edge cases like not-found behavior, but that is minor for a safe, idempotent lookup.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the required id parameter at all. The agent must infer from the schema and tool name that id selects which saved view to retrieve.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly identifies the resource as a single saved view and explains the value-add: it includes filter rules so the view can be reproduced as a search. This also differentiates it from list_saved_views, which returns a collection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'one saved view' and the purpose clause 'so you can reproduce it as a search' give a clear context for when to call this tool. It does not explicitly name alternatives or exclusions, but the intended use is evident.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.