easyar_create_mobile_settings_helper

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions creating a script and implies modification of player settings, but does not detail side effects like file overwriting, permissions, or reversibility. The 'overwrite' parameter hints at replacement, but no explicit behavioral context is given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and scope. Every word serves a purpose, with no unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 7 parameters and no output schema. The description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., script path, success message) or the full effect on the project. It only says 'creates a script', leaving the agent unsure of what to expect after invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds context that the settings are 'commonly required by EasyAR camera samples', which provides slight extra meaning beyond the schema, but overall the schema already describes each parameter adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a Unity Editor script for applying Android/iOS player settings required by EasyAR camera samples. The verb 'create' and resource 'mobile settings helper' are specific, though it does not differentiate itself from sibling tools like 'easyar_create_build_settings_helper'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools include other creation helpers, but the description gives no criteria for choosing this one, such as when player settings vs build settings are needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.