sign_up

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description transparently discloses the side effects: creating an account and organization, connecting the machine, generating a password locally, and not showing or storing it. This is especially important given the openWorldHint and readOnlyHint annotations, and the description fully aligns with them.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and well-structured, using two focused sentences to convey purpose, side effects, and caller instructions. There is no redundant or extraneous content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the essential context: what the tool does, what the agent should ask for, and important security-related behavior. It does not describe failure cases or return behavior, but given the absence of an output schema and the clear side-effect disclosure, it is sufficiently complete for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides clear descriptions for all three required parameters, and the tool description mostly restates them rather than adding deeper semantic meaning. It does not introduce ambiguity, but it also does not significantly extend the schema's parameter-level detail.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a brand-new TaskLite account and organization and connects the machine, distinguishing it from login, connection_status, and other account-related tools. It also explicitly notes that no website visit is needed, further clarifying its unique purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs the agent to ask the user for email, name, and business name before calling, and explains the sign-up flow including the locally generated password and forgot-password behavior. This gives clear and actionable usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.