create_project

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnly false and destructive false, which aligns with the 'Create' verb. The description adds context about the project being a container for boards, but does not disclose any side effects or specific behaviors beyond the creation itself.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, using only two sentences to convey the purpose and a key characteristic. It is well-structured, with the action stated first.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple create operation with a fully described input schema, the description is adequate. It explains the fundamental concept of a project and its relationship to boards. It does not mention output or error cases, but these are not required given the absence of an output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already provides descriptions for all three parameters (name, description, organizationId). The tool description adds no additional semantic information, so it does not improve upon the schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States the specific action ('Create a project') and defines what a project is ('a business process container'). It gives enough context to distinguish from board creation, but could be more explicit about when to use this vs other create tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_board or list_projects. No conditions or selection criteria mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.