Skip to main content
Glama
tasklite-net

TaskLite MCP

by tasklite-net
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TaskLite MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Argent

      moawhi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Turns existing backend APIs (OpenAPI) and SQL databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB, ClickHouse) into hosted MCP servers for AI clients, with built-in dashboards, forms, and credential encryption.
      3,257 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • Aaly

      candysiva
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A remote MCP server that lets a coding agent turn a plain-language idea into a real, shareable product — creating the project and data model, serving live API endpoints, deploying custom endpoints and server-side functions, and reading request and function logs. It handles sign-up, OAuth-backed access, and OpenAPI spec generation so people can open, sign into, and use the app the agent builds.
      MIT

    • Omni-MCP

      FuadTesfaye
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to turn any API, CLI, database, website, SDK, or codebase into a production-ready MCP server with secure, dynamically discoverable capabilities.
      MIT

    • Faucet

      faucetdb
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turn PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, Oracle, SQLite or Snowflake into MCP tools and a REST API, with API keys and per-table role-based access.
      8
      119
      MIT

    • MCP-Maker

      MrAliHasan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Auto-generates MCP servers from any data source, enabling AI clients to query databases, spreadsheets, and APIs with zero code.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (projects, boards, columns, items, comments, apps, automations, deployments), and overlapping pairs like login/connect and query_items/search/fetch are separated by explicit credential/scope guidance. A few adjacent tools (build_backend vs the step-by-step creates, update_item vs set_cell) could be confused, but their descriptions call out when to use which.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set overwhelmingly follows verb_noun snake_case (list_projects, create_column, update_item, delete_board, rollback_deployment). Minor deviations exist — add_comment vs create_comment, query_items vs list_items, connection_status vs get_connection_status, and bare verbs like login/connect — but they are easy to predict and not chaotic.

    Tool Count2/5

    48 tools is a very large surface for one server, well beyond the 16-25 'heavy' range. Even with a broad scope spanning auth, schema design, apps, automations, and deployment, the count will force agents to browse and compare many similar CRUD tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are well covered: projects/boards/columns have full CRUD, items and comments have full CRUD, and app endpoints plus deployment have create/list/update. But several lifecycle gaps stand out — automations can be created and listed but not updated/deleted, apps have no delete/unpublish/revoke-key operations, and projects cannot be renamed/updated.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources