Skip to main content
Glama
tasklite-net

TaskLite MCP

by tasklite-net
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to TaskLite MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Argent

      moawhi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Turns existing backend APIs (OpenAPI) and SQL databases (PostgreSQL, MariaDB, ClickHouse) into hosted MCP servers for AI clients, with built-in dashboards, forms, and credential encryption.
      9 npm
      MIT

    • Omni-MCP

      FuadTesfaye
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to turn any API, CLI, database, website, SDK, or codebase into a production-ready MCP server with secure, dynamically discoverable capabilities.
      MIT

    • MCP-Maker

      MrAliHasan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Auto-generates MCP servers from any data source, enabling AI clients to query databases, spreadsheets, and APIs with zero code.
      5
      MIT

    • kcf-mcp

      mikec-chi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server that lets Claude, ChatGPT, or VS Code build a complete, machine-checked model of your domain and generate an app from it.
      Apache 2.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource+action (projects, boards, columns, items, comments, apps, automations, deployments), and overlapping pairs like login/connect and query_items/search/fetch are separated by explicit credential/scope guidance. A few adjacent tools (build_backend vs the step-by-step creates, update_item vs set_cell) could be confused, but their descriptions call out when to use which.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set overwhelmingly follows verb_noun snake_case (list_projects, create_column, update_item, delete_board, rollback_deployment). Minor deviations exist — add_comment vs create_comment, query_items vs list_items, connection_status vs get_connection_status, and bare verbs like login/connect — but they are easy to predict and not chaotic.

    Tool Count2/5

    48 tools is a very large surface for one server, well beyond the 16-25 'heavy' range. Even with a broad scope spanning auth, schema design, apps, automations, and deployment, the count will force agents to browse and compare many similar CRUD tools.

    Completeness3/5

    Core workflows are well covered: projects/boards/columns have full CRUD, items and comments have full CRUD, and app endpoints plus deployment have create/list/update. But several lifecycle gaps stand out — automations can be created and listed but not updated/deleted, apps have no delete/unpublish/revoke-key operations, and projects cannot be renamed/updated.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources