get_reason
Retrieve a specific reason instance by its unique ID from the Tenable Identity Exposure API.
Instructions
Get reason instance by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Path parameter: id |
Retrieve a specific reason instance by its unique ID from the Tenable Identity Exposure API.
Get reason instance by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Path parameter: id |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description implies a read-only operation but provides no details on permissions, side effects, or return format. With no annotations, the description fails to disclose behavioral traits beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the key action and resource. No superfluous words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally sufficient but lacks guidance on usage context and return values. Adequate but incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'id' described as 'Path parameter: id'. The description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond 'by id', so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get reason instance by id' clearly specifies the action (get), resource (reason instance), and method (by id). It distinguishes from siblings like list_reasons and get_reason_by_checker.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_reasons or get_reason_by_event. The agent receives no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/taherkaraki/tie-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server