tie-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to tie-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables interaction with SailPoint IdentityNow and Identity Security Cloud for identity governance and access management. It provides comprehensive tools to manage identities, accounts, roles, workflows, and certifications through API integration.36-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for ConnectSecure vulnerability management, exposing 285 read-only tools to query assets, vulnerabilities, Active Directory, and more via natural language.-
- FlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for CIPP (Community IT Professionals Platform), enabling MSPs to manage Microsoft 365 tenants, users, policies, and security settings through CIPP's API.4512-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI-powered assessment of Active Directory on-premises environments by exposing AD data as queryable tools for LLMs like Claude.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing 100% coverage of the CISO Assistant GRC REST API through action-routed tools for compliance, risk management, and other security domains.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for Tenable Vulnerability Management and the Tenable One platform, enabling LLMs to query assets, vulnerabilities, scans, exposure metrics, attack paths, and more via natural language.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 133 tools
Many tools have near-identical names and descriptions, such as get_ad_object_by_directory vs. get_ad_object_by_infrastructure, get_event vs. get_event_by_directory, and test_email_notifier vs. test_email_notifier_by_email_notifier. The large number of overlapping resource-specific variants makes it difficult for an agent to reliably select the correct tool.
The tool set mostly follows a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern like list/get/create/update/delete_X. Minor deviations such as clone_profile, unstage_profile, commit_profile, and test_X_by_X variants are noticeable but still predictable.
With 133 tools, the server is far beyond a well-scoped MCP surface. Even for a broad AD security management domain, the sheer number of tools—including many near-duplicate accessor variants—makes the server overwhelming and difficult to navigate.
The server provides extensive CRUD/lifecycle coverage for users, roles, profiles, infrastructures, directories, dashboards, widgets, syslogs, email notifiers, and configuration singletons. Minor gaps exist, such as no delete operation for API keys or checker/attack type options, but core workflows are largely covered.