list_documents
List all documents and filter by tags to narrow results.
Instructions
List all documents, optionally filtered by tags
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tags | No |
List all documents and filter by tags to narrow results.
List all documents, optionally filtered by tags
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tags | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description implies read-only but omits details like pagination, rate limits, or return format. Minimal transparency beyond basic operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence of 8 words is extremely concise and front-loaded with the action and resource. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, no annotations, and description fails to mention return format, pagination, or default behavior. For a list tool, these missing details reduce completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The 'tags' parameter is described as an optional filter, adding meaning beyond the schema type. However, it lacks specifics on filtering logic (e.g., AND/OR, case sensitivity).
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'List all documents' with an optional filter, distinguishing it from siblings like 'get_document' and 'upload_document'. Could be more precise about scope (e.g., user's documents) but is effective.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'get_document' or 'list_projects'. The filtering option is mentioned but no context on prerequisites or limitations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/swapnilsurdi/mcp-pa'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server