get_dashboard
Retrieve an overview of active projects, upcoming todos, and scheduled events.
Instructions
Get a dashboard view of active projects, upcoming todos, and events
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve an overview of active projects, upcoming todos, and scheduled events.
Get a dashboard view of active projects, upcoming todos, and events
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavior; it implies a read operation but lacks explicit details on safety, permissions, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single clear sentence, efficient and front-loaded, though slightly more structure could improve completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, the description should explain the return format or content; it only mentions an aggregate view without detailing what fields are included.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100% trivially; the description adds no parameter info, but baseline for 0 params is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves a dashboard view combining active projects, upcoming todos, and events, distinguishing it from sibling list tools that return individual data sets.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies use for a high-level overview but does not explicitly contrast with siblings or specify when not to use it, leaving the agent to infer context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/swapnilsurdi/mcp-pa'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server