get_alert
Fetch details of a specific alert using its ID to view its state, name, and configuration.
Instructions
Get details of a specific alert
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | ID of the alert to get |
Fetch details of a specific alert using its ID to view its state, name, and configuration.
Get details of a specific alert
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | ID of the alert to get |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must imply safety. 'Get' suggests a read-only operation, but does not explicitly state no side effects, idempotency, or permissions needed. Adequate but minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no extraneous information. However, it could be slightly more informative without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally complete. It does not list return fields or structure, but the tool's purpose is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the parameter description already explains 'alertId'. The description adds no additional semantics beyond 'specific alert', which repeats the tool name. Baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The verb 'get' and resource 'alert' are clear. The description distinguishes from 'list_alerts' by specifying 'a specific alert', but does not explicitly differentiate from other sibling tools. A higher score would require explicit mention of scope or uniqueness.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'list_alerts'. The agent must infer usage from the parameter. There are no when-not-to or alternative suggestions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/suthio/redash-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server