delete_alert
Delete an alert from Redash by specifying its alert ID.
Instructions
Delete an alert from Redash
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | ID of the alert to delete |
Delete an alert from Redash by specifying its alert ID.
Delete an alert from Redash
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| alertId | Yes | ID of the alert to delete |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only says 'delete,' implying destruction, but does not mention irreversibility, cascading effects (e.g., on subscriptions), or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and immediately clear.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 1-parameter delete tool without output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks details like return value, success criteria, or side effects. The absence of annotations increases the need for contextual completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the schema already describes 'alertId' as the ID of the alert to delete. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Delete') and the resource ('an alert from Redash'), which is distinct from sibling tools like 'create_alert', 'update_alert', 'mute_alert', and 'get_alert'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites (e.g., alert must exist), or alternatives. The description only states what it does without context for decision-making.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/suthio/redash-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server