Skip to main content
Glama
suhitanantula

LLV Helix Framework

trace_line

Trace a strategic line with adjustable speed and carry messages to maintain rhythmic flow in creative workflows.

Instructions

Trace along a line with a specific rhythm

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
line_nameYesName of the line to trace
speedNoSpeed multiplier
messageNoMessage or data to carry along the line

Implementation Reference

  • The traceLine method handles the 'trace_line' tool logic. It looks up a line by name, checks if it exists, retrieves the rhythm, creates a trace object with timestamp/message/speed/rhythmStep, pushes it to the line's traces array, and returns a formatted response with animation.
    traceLine(args) {
      const { line_name, speed = 1, message = '' } = args;
      const line = this.lines.get(line_name);
    
      if (!line) {
        return {
          content: [
            {
              type: 'text',
              text: `❌ Line "${line_name}" not found.`,
            },
          ],
        };
      }
    
      const rhythm = this.rhythms.get(`line_${line_name}`);
      const trace = {
        timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
        message,
        speed,
        rhythmStep: rhythm ? rhythm.next() : 1,
      };
    
      line.traces.push(trace);
    
      return {
        content: [
          {
            type: 'text',
            text: `〰️ Tracing line "${line_name}"\n\nFrom: ${line.from} → To: ${line.to}\nSpeed: ${speed}x\nMessage: "${message}"\n\n${this.animateLineTrace(line.rhythm, speed)}\n\nRhythm pulse: ${trace.rhythmStep}`,
          },
        ],
      };
    }
  • The input schema for 'trace_line' tool, defining properties: line_name (string, required), speed (number 0.1-10), and message (string).
    {
      name: 'trace_line',
      description: 'Trace along a line with a specific rhythm',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          line_name: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Name of the line to trace',
          },
          speed: {
            type: 'number',
            minimum: 0.1,
            maximum: 10,
            description: 'Speed multiplier',
          },
          message: {
            type: 'string',
            description: 'Message or data to carry along the line',
          },
        },
        required: ['line_name'],
      },
  • index.js:339-340 (registration)
    Registration of the 'trace_line' tool in the switch statement that dispatches tool calls to the traceLine handler method.
    case 'trace_line':
      return this.traceLine(args);
  • Helper method animateLineTrace used by trace_line to generate a visual animation based on speed.
    animateLineTrace(rhythm, speed) {
      const base = '→';
      const fast = '⟫';
      const slow = '⟶';
      const symbol = speed > 1.5 ? fast : speed < 0.5 ? slow : base;
      return symbol.repeat(8);
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only mentions tracing along a line with a rhythm, but does not disclose behavioral traits: whether it reads or modifies, what 'rhythm' means, or any side effects. Inadequate for safe agent invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence, concise but lacking in substantive detail. It earns its place but does not provide sufficient value for an agent.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters (one required), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too brief. It does not explain what 'trace' entails, the effect on the line, or the role of 'rhythm'. Incomplete for effective tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all three parameters. The tool description adds no further meaning. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('trace') and resource ('line') with a qualifier ('with a specific rhythm'). It clearly indicates the tool's function, but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'compose_rhythm' or 'create_line'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'compose_rhythm' or 'iterate_loop'. There are no exclusions or context cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/suhitanantula/llv-helix'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server