Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
LLV Helix Framework

LLV Helix Framework

by suhitanantula
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

compose_rhythm

Compose a complex rhythm by integrating weighted components from lines, loops, and vibes at a defined tempo.

Instructions

Compose a complex rhythm from lines, loops, and vibes

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "name": "<name>",
      "components": "<components>"
    },
    "name": "compose_rhythm"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesName for the composed rhythm
componentsYesComponents and their weights
tempoNoBase tempo in BPM

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

C2.8/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it is destructive, requires specific inputs, or has side effects. The description only states the action without behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, concise but minimal. It could be more informative without being verbose, earning a middling score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how components are combined, what the output is, or any constraints, leaving the agent with insufficient guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers all three parameters with descriptions, so baseline is 3. The description adds marginal context by linking components to 'lines, loops, and vibes', but does not explain the meaning of 'weight' or how 'tempo' is used.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'compose' and resource 'complex rhythm', and hints at using 'lines, loops, and vibes' which are sibling tools, differentiating its purpose from creating individual elements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_line, create_loop, or create_vibe. It does not specify prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools