get_v1_story_download_by_story_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description does not reveal behavioral traits such as what the download returns (e.g., file content, URL), authorization needs, rate limits, or file format. The tool likely produces a file download, but this is not clarified.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but redundant, repeating the same sentence twice. It could be more concise and front-loaded with key information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple schema and lack of output schema, the description should at least hint at what 'download story file' entails (e.g., file format, size). It is incomplete and does not prepare the agent for the response.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning beyond the schema. The parameter 'url' is mentioned only in the example (which is truncated), with no explanation of format or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Download story file by story URL' with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from siblings like get_v1_story_download and get_v1_story_download_by_url, which have nearly identical names and purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_v1_story_download or get_v1_story_download_by_url). No context about prerequisites, limitations, or appropriate scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.