get_v1_media_comments_chunk

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses the chunk size (15 comments per request), implying pagination. However, no annotations exist, and the description does not cover other behaviors like ordering, error conditions, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but repetitive ('Get media comments' and 'Get comments on a media' are redundant). The HTTP method and path in the first sentence are unnecessary. Front-loaded but could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks explanation of pagination (how to use min_id/max_id for next pages) and output structure. For a paginated API with no output schema, the description should provide more context to enable correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description provides no explanation of parameters. While parameter names (id, min_id, max_id, can_support_threading) hint at their purpose, the description adds no semantic value beyond the schema titles.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Get media comments' and specifies the chunk size (15 comments per request). It identifies the resource and action, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_v2_media_comments or get_v2_media_comments_replies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_v2_media_comments. No prerequisites or context for pagination described.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.