get_v2_user_suggested_profiles

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It implies a read-only operation (GET) and mentions an optional parameter for detail, but does not specify side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or error behavior. This is adequate but not comprehensive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, using only three short sentences. It front-loads the endpoint and purpose, then gives a key usage hint. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should hint at return values or structure. It says 'more detailed response' but nothing concrete. It also lacks context on when to use this tool over many siblings, leaving agents underinformed for selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It describes 'expand_suggestion' as providing a more detailed response, adding meaning. However, it refers to 'target_id' instead of the actual parameter name 'user_id', causing slight ambiguity. It does not define the format or constraints of 'user_id'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Fetch Suggestion Details' and 'Fetch suggested users details by target_id', using a precise verb and resource. The tool name and title uniquely identify it among many sibling tools as specific to suggested profiles, making its purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions the 'expand_suggestion' parameter for more detailed response, but does not explain when to choose this over other user-related tools or any prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.