wetrack_delete_project_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that this is a deletion, but it does not say whether the actual file is removed or only the database record, whether deletion is irreversible, what permissions are needed, or what side effects may occur. This is thin for a destructive operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded, with the purpose stated first followed by a compact argument list. There is no filler, though it is more of a skeletal docstring than an enriched explanation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter delete with an output schema, the core invocation information is present: what action to take and which IDs to provide. But without annotations and with no mention of effects, permissions, or how to discover valid IDs, the description is only minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no descriptions, so the description's 'project_id: The project UUID' and 'file_id: The file UUID to delete' adds useful identifier-type meaning beyond the bare schema titles. However, it does not explain how to resolve these IDs or provide constraints beyond being UUIDs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Delete a project file record.' This is a specific verb plus resource and is distinguishable from sibling tools such as wetrack_add_project_file, wetrack_list_project_files, and wetrack_delete_ticket_attachment. It lacks an explicit comparison to siblings, so it does not earn a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool instead of another deletion tool, how to obtain the required IDs, or what prerequisites apply. The description only states what the tool does, not when to use it or what to verify first.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.