Skip to main content
Glama
stevepridemore

Graph-Memory

by stevepridemore
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Graph Weaken

graph_weaken
Idempotent

Reduce the weight of a graph edge when the user corrects a recalled fact, such as saying 'no' or 'that's wrong'. Persists immediately with weight clamped at 0.0.

Instructions

Decrease an edge's weight when the user corrects a recalled fact. Call this when the user says 'no', 'that's wrong', or corrects something from the graph. Persists immediately; weight clamps at 0.0. Returns an error if the edge doesn't exist — use graph_delete to remove an entity outright. To replace a fact rather than weaken it, prefer graph_relate with the new fact and SUPERSEDES.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountNoWeaken amount (default: 0.3)
reasonNoWhy weakening
to_nameYesTarget entity name or ID
relationYesRelationship type
from_nameYesSource entity name or ID

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv0.2.2
  2. Removedv0.1.4
  3. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / amount / default
      Added value: +0.3
  4. First observedv1.0.0

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes persistence, clamping at 0.0, and error if edge doesn't exist. Adds value beyond annotations (idempotentHint) with concrete behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences, each essential and front-loaded. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, usage, behavior, and alternatives. Missing output schema but tool's effect is straightforward; description suffices for correct use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters with descriptions; description does not add significant new meaning beyond schema. Baseline 3 due to high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action (decrease edge weight) and context (user correction of recalled fact). Distinguishes from siblings like graph_delete and graph_relate with SUPERSEDES.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to call (user says 'no', 'that's wrong') and when not to (use graph_delete for removal, graph_relate for replacement). Provides clear alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools