Skip to main content
Glama

Graph Entities

graph_entities
Read-only

Search or browse the entity catalog to find existing entities by type, name, or confidence score. Use to check existence before creating new relationships.

Instructions

Browse or search the entity catalog. Use to check if an entity exists before creating one with graph_relate, or to list entities of a given type. For relationship-aware lookups (entity + its neighbors) use graph_query instead. Returns up to limit entities ordered by sort_by; pagination is single-page (raise limit if you need more).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
searchNoFull-text search query
typeNoFilter by entity type (Person, Project, Concept, etc.)
min_confidenceNoMin confidence threshold
sort_byNoSort order (default: confidence)confidence
limitNoMax results (default: 20)
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint, description adds that pagination is single-page (raise limit for more results) and the sorting/limit behavior, which is beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: purpose, usage context, behavioral note. No fluff. Front-loaded with verb and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Reasonably complete for a read-only listing tool with no output schema. Covers purpose, use cases, and pagination. Could mention default parameters but schema does.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds little new parameter info beyond what schema provides. Mentions limit and sort_by in behavior but not meaningfully deeper.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool browses/searches the entity catalog. It explicitly contrasts with graph_relate (creation) and graph_query (relationship-aware lookups), distinguishing purpose among siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells when to use: to check entity existence before graph_relate or to list by type. Also tells when not: use graph_query for neighbor lookups. Includes pagination behavior hint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/stevepridemore/graph-memory'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server