Skip to main content
Glama

Graph Cypher

graph_cypher
Read-only

Execute read-only Cypher queries on a personal knowledge graph to retrieve custom data beyond predefined tools.

Instructions

Execute a read-only Cypher query against the memory graph. You generate the Cypher — this tool just runs it. Enforced read-only via Neo4j executeRead(). Use for custom queries not covered by other tools. Admin-only (must be the bootstrap tenant) — non-admin tenants would otherwise be able to bypass tenant filtering by writing raw Cypher.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cypherYesCypher query to execute (read-only)
paramsNoQuery parameters
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint=true, and the description reinforces it by stating 'Enforced read-only via Neo4j executeRead()'. Adds context about admin-only restriction and security rationale, which goes beyond the annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with 4 sentences, front-loading the core purpose. Every sentence adds value: purpose, user responsibility, read-only enforcement, admin-only restriction. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (2 parameters, no output schema), the description covers purpose, usage, constraints (admin-only), safety (read-only), and rationale. It is complete for effective selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description mentions the cypher parameter but does not add significant detail beyond the schema. The params parameter is an object, but no additional explanation is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool executes a read-only Cypher query against the memory graph, with the user generating the Cypher. It differentiates from siblings by specifying use for custom queries not covered by other tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (custom queries not covered by other tools) and when not to use (admin-only bootstrap tenant). Provides rationale for the admin restriction, preventing tenant bypass. Implies alternatives by mentioning other tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/stevepridemore/graph-memory'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server