starwind_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states what the tool searches but does not confirm it's read-only, describe side effects, authentication needs, rate limits, or any other behavioral characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's action and scope. It could be slightly improved by structuring with lists or brief usage notes, but it is not verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (8 parameters, many without descriptions), the description is insufficient. It does not mention filtering dimensions like surface, category, plan, or how the output is structured, despite the output schema existing. The agent would lack context to leverage all features.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is low at 38% (3 of 8 parameters have descriptions). The tool description adds no parameter-level meaning beyond the schema's sparse descriptions. It does not explain the role of query, category, offset, plan, or framework in search behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool searches across specific resources (Starwind UI v3 styled components, Primitive adapters, Starwind Pro blocks) with framework-aware results. This distinguishes it from sibling tools (init, add, docs, migrate) which are not search functions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, limitations, or exclusions. The context is purely implicit from the tool name and siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.