starwind_add

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states 'generates validated... commands' but does not clarify whether the tool only outputs commands or also executes them. Parameters like 'init' and 'overwrite' suggest potential side effects, yet the description omits any discussion of safety, authentication, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose without unnecessary words. Every element earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 9 parameters and an output schema. While the description covers the high-level purpose, it lacks details on parameter relationships, the fact that 'components' can be 'all', and whether the tool executes commands or just generates them. The output schema exists, so return values are not missing, but the behavioral and contextual gaps reduce completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 78%, so the schema already documents most parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description does not improve understanding of the two undocumented parameters (cwd, packageManager).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('generates') and resource ('validated Starwind UI v3 install commands') and clearly distinguishes from siblings like starwind_init (initialization) and starwind_search (search) by focusing on component installation with optional framework targeting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for adding components after setup, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus starwind_init or starwind_migrate. No when-not-to-use or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.