starwind_init

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that the tool generates a command (not directly modifying anything), mentions auto-detection behavior, and notes Pro is opt-in targeting Astro. This is strong coverage of behavioral effects, missing only potential side effects or return format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no filler. Front-loaded with the core action, then specifics on auto-detection and Pro. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the output schema exists (not shown but flagged as present), the description does not need to detail return values. It covers generation scope, framework detection, and Pro behavior. Completeness is high; minor gap could be a note that this does not install dependencies or modify files directly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 75% (3 of 4 parameters described). The description adds context that 'pro' is opt-in and targets Astro, and that 'framework' override is optional. The 'packageManager' parameter lacks any description enrichment, but the overall additive value is moderate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the tool generates a Starwind UI v3 initialization command for existing Astro or React projects. This specific verb+resource combination clearly distinguishes it from siblings like 'starwind_add', 'starwind_search', 'starwind_docs', and 'starwind_migrate'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions CLI auto-detects the framework unless overridden, and that Pro authorization is opt-in targeting Astro. This provides clear context for when to override vs. not, though it does not explicitly state when this tool is preferred over siblings or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.