vk_wall_check_copyright_link
Check if a link violates copyright on VK wall posts. Identifies copyright infringement for submitted URLs.
Instructions
wall.checkCopyrightLink
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| link | Yes |
Check if a link violates copyright on VK wall posts. Identifies copyright infringement for submitted URLs.
wall.checkCopyrightLink
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| link | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description offers no behavioral insight. The name implies checking a copyright link, but there is no info on actions, side effects, or requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely short (one phrase), which could be concise, but it lacks any informative structure. It is under-specification rather than efficient conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given zero annotations, no output schema, and a single parameter, the description is completely inadequate. An agent cannot correctly invoke or select this tool based on this definition.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the single 'link' parameter. No hints about format, constraints, or purpose beyond the parameter name.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is just the method name 'wall.checkCopyrightLink' with no verb or resource clarification. It is a tautology, providing no purpose beyond the name itself.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like vk_wall_get or vk_wall_search. No context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ssm82/full-vk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server