vk_photos_get_all_comments

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description should cover behavioral traits. Only mentions sorting order; no info on pagination, auth, rate limits, or response format. Minimal disclosure beyond basic purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, clear and to the point. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks details on return format, pagination behavior, error conditions, or prerequisites. With 5 parameters and no output schema, description should provide more context to fully inform usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with each parameter described. The description adds no new meaning beyond the schema; it only restates the tool's aim. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it returns comments on a specific photo album or all albums, sorted in reverse chronological order. The verb 'Returns' and resource 'comments on album(s)' are precise, and it distinguishes from the sibling tool vk_photos_get_comments which operates on photos.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for album-level comments but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like vk_photos_get_comments. No when-not or alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.