vk_groups_get_token_permissions
Retrieve permissions assigned to a VK group access token. Check which actions the token can perform within a group.
Instructions
groups.getTokenPermissions
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve permissions assigned to a VK group access token. Check which actions the token can perform within a group.
groups.getTokenPermissions
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations and the description provides no behavioral details. Does not disclose authentication needs, side effects, or return value characteristics.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but under-specified. One word of actual content (the method name) does not qualify as effective conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Completely inadequate for a tool with no annotations and no output schema. Should describe purpose and return value.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so the schema coverage is 100%, but the description adds zero meaning. It fails to state what the tool does, which is still necessary.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description is a tautology, restating the tool name 'groups.getTokenPermissions' without explaining what it does. No verb or resource context provided.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when or when not to use this tool. Sibling tools like vk_groups_get exist but no differentiation is offered.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/ssm82/full-vk-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server