get_brand

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided. The description adds useful context about what the brand settings include (DESIGN.md injection). It implies read-only behavior but does not disclose authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects beyond the apiKey parameter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with key information, no wasted words. Highly concise and structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter), no output schema, and no annotations, the description is nearly complete. It explains what the tool returns, but could benefit from mentioning potential errors or default behavior when apiKey is omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the sole parameter (apiKey). The tool description does not add meaning beyond what the schema already provides, so baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves workspace brand settings, listing specific items (colors, logo, fonts, and DESIGN.md spec). It distinguishes itself from the sibling `update_brand` as a read operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use or not use this tool vs alternatives. However, as a simple getter, context is implicit; no exclusions or prerequisites are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.