get_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the response includes 'trigger config and template binding', which goes beyond the input schema. It implicitly indicates a read operation but does not mention auth requirements, rate limits, or error states. For a simple retrieval tool, this is sufficient but not exhaustive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that conveys the core purpose without any fluff. Every word is necessary, and it is front-loaded with the key action and result.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with 2 parameters (100% schema coverage) and no output schema, the description provides all essential context: what the tool returns (Action with trigger config and template binding). No additional information is needed for correct usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add any additional meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema already provides (actionId is an ID, apiKey is for overriding env var). No extra usage details or constraints are given.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get a single Action with its trigger config and template binding' clearly specifies the verb (Get), resource (Action), and adds scope ('single') and included details (trigger config, template binding). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_actions (which returns multiple) and create_action/update_action (which modify).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need a specific action by ID, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_actions or get_automation. No exclusions or prerequisites are mentioned, though the actionId parameter requirement is clear from the schema.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.