Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pixelbolt

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables creating and editing pixel art, sprites, sprite sheets, tiles, icons, particle and fluid effects, and short animations from editable JSON recipes, exporting as PNG, GIF, APNG, or video frames while working only with local project files.
      656 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create layered pixel-art sprites and animations, inspect pixels, and export images, spritesheets, GIFs, APNGs, and TrueType pixel fonts. Documents and edits stay local, accessible over stdio MCP or callable directly from a shell.
      26
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to automate the creation, editing, animation, and export of pixel-art game assets through a multi-agent pipeline that derives style specs and blueprints, generates Lua build scripts, and drives the canvas editor to produce .aseprite files, spritesheets, atlases, GIFs, and previews.
      12
      120 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables coding agents to create, edit, inspect, render, diff, preview, watch, and export indexed pixel-art sprites and animations as text grids through twelve MCP tools, including .tt and .aseprite import/export.
      601 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to create, draw, and refine Aseprite documents through deterministic canvas, layer, frame, tag, and palette tools, with pixel analyzers, style validation, and preview/diff visual feedback. It also supports spritesheet and animated GIF export, producing multi-layer game-ready assets.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a fairly distinct role: help, import, patch, compile, scene, inspect, render, validate. The closest overlaps are render vs. inspect (both return images, but inspect is explicitly non-exporting and render writes files) and compile vs. scene (both compose imagery, but one is animation/effects and the other is room/tilemap composition). Descriptions resolve these, though an agent could occasionally hesitate between compile and scene.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use a consistent pixel_ prefix followed by a single clear verb (help, import, patch, render, compile, inspect, scene, validate). The convention is predictable throughout with no style mixing.

    Tool Count5/5

    Eight tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each corresponds to a distinct stage of the pixel-art lifecycle (onboard, import, edit, generate, compose, preview, validate, export). No tool feels redundant or gratuitous.

    Completeness4/5

    The lifecycle is well covered: help, import, patch, compile, scene, inspect, validate, and render form a coherent pipeline. Minor gaps exist—no explicit tool to create a blank document from scratch (help/recipe format implies it) and no listing/delete of projects or revisions—but these are workable.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues