efinity-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to efinity-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to drive Xilinx Vivado, Intel Quartus, and Anlogic TangDynasty for FPGA development, including project creation, synthesis, implementation, timing closure, and hardware programming through natural language.35 PyPI4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to drive Xilinx Vivado through natural language, letting users open .xpr projects, run synthesis, implementation, and bitstream generation, inspect timing, resource, and clock reports, and launch simulations to read signal values or set breakpoints. It also exposes design hierarchy queries and arbitrary TCL execution, so FPGA design flows can be operated conversationally on Windows.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI coding agents and IDEs to run a complete open-source FPGA flow, including synthesis, place-and-route, bitstream generation, and safe hardware programming for iCE40/ECP5 boards.68 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceProvides AI assistants with a complete FPGA toolchain for HDL linting, simulation, synthesis, and place-and-route across various hardware targets. It features a GitHub-backed IP core registry that enables users to search for and import MIT-licensed cores directly through their chat interface.151MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to drive a locally installed Xilinx Vivado through 32 curated tools spanning sessions, synthesis, implementation, timing, CDC, XDC, IP, waveform inspection, and device programming. It also provides structured timing evidence with baseline comparison, bounded offline VCD queries, environment self-diagnosis, and Chinese-language diagnostics for timing and CRITICAL WARNING issues.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents such as Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex to safely drive a locally installed Xilinx Vivado through 32 tools covering sessions, synthesis, implementation, timing, CDC, XDC, IP, waveforms, and device programming. Includes structured timing evidence with baseline comparison, offline VCD queries, evidence-driven workflow prompts, and one-command environment self-checks.-
TDQS
Scored across 27 tools
Tool purposes are mostly distinct, and the descriptions clearly separate enumerations from details, reports from actions, and summary views from specialized queries. The main overlap risk is between get_build_status and the specialized timing/utilization/messages tools, and between get_interface_design's optional check and check_interface, but these are not severe.
All tools use lowercase snake_case with a consistent verb-first pattern: list_* for enumerations, get_* for entities and status, create_/update_ for project mutations, and run_/check_/calc_/export_/program_ for actions. There are no camelCase or mixed-convention names.
27 tools is on the heavier side, but the server covers a broad FPGA lifecycle: project management, interface design, build flow, timing analysis, reporting, and programming. Each tool has a defined role, and while a few reporting tools could be consolidated, the count is defensible for the domain.
The lifecycle is well covered: project create/update/read, Interface Designer editing/checking/export, flow execution and job monitoring, timing and STA analysis, report access, and device programming. Minor gaps such as no project deletion or direct SDC editing are workable and do not create dead ends.