fusion_measure_distance
Measure the minimum distance (in mm) between two bodies in a Fusion 360 design.
Instructions
Minimum distance in millimetres between two bodies.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body_a | Yes | ||
| body_b | Yes |
Measure the minimum distance (in mm) between two bodies in a Fusion 360 design.
Minimum distance in millimetres between two bodies.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| body_a | Yes | ||
| body_b | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate read-only, nondestructive, open world. Description adds that it returns distance in millimeters, but lacks details on error handling or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Perfectly concise for the simplicity of the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple read-only measurement tool, but missing details on parameter types (integer/string) and return behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, description adds no meaning for 'body_a' and 'body_b'. Does not clarify if they are IDs, names, or selection strings.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb (measure distance) and resource (two bodies), and distinguishes from sibling 'fusion_measure_angle'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. Leaves agent to infer usage context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/shimmerjordan/self-host-fusion360-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server