fusion_delete_all

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reinforces the destructiveHint annotation by stating 'Destructive.' and adds that it clears the design. However, it does not disclose potential irreversible effects or confirmations. With annotations already marking it destructive, the additional behavioral context is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, concise sentence conveys the core purpose without unnecessary words. Every part is essential.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no parameters, no output schema, and a simple destructive action, the description is mostly complete. It could mention that deletion is permanent or that the design is reverted, but current wording suffices.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist, so the description does not need to explain them. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate as there is nothing missing.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states 'Delete every timeline feature, clearing the design.', clearly identifying the action and scope. It distinguishes from sibling tools like fusion_delete_body or fusion_delete_parameter which target specific elements.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., selective deletions or undo). Only 'Destructive.' is present, which is already indicated by the destructiveHint annotation. Lacks context for appropriate invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.