self-host-fusion360-MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to self-host-fusion360-MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceOpen-source MCP server for controlling Autodesk Fusion 360 from any AI agent, enabling 3D modeling operations via natural language.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents genuine 3D spatial understanding of Autodesk Fusion 360, enabling exact measurements, collision analysis, and free-space placement search, plus Fusion-native parametric authoring for clean, human-editable models.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceConnects AI coding agents to Autodesk Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM automation, exposing 84 tools for sketching, modeling, assembly, inspection, export, and G-code post-processing through any MCP-compatible client.85MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that drives SolidWorks 2023+ on Windows, exposing CAD operations like sketching, extrusions, assemblies, and exports through tools for AI assistants like Kimi and Claude.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that connects LLMs with Autodesk Fusion, enabling CAD operations through natural language dialogue.4MIT
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible assistants to control Autodesk Fusion for mechanical modeling, assembly editing, CAM workflows, inspection, and model export through Fusion's native MCP endpoint.391MIT
TDQS
Scored across 98 tools
Each tool targets a specific action or object type (e.g., list_bodies vs list_components vs list_faces), and descriptions clearly distinguish their purposes. Very little overlap in functionality.
All tools follow the consistent prefix 'fusion_' followed by a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., fusion_extrude, fusion_list_bodies). No mixing of cases or inconsistent verb styles.
98 tools is a large number for an MCP server. While the complexity of Fusion 360 may warrant many operations, this volume can overwhelm an agent's selection process and increase prompts length. A more curated set would be more manageable.
The tool set covers a wide range of modeling, sketching, CAM, document, and inspection operations. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit 'create slot' or advanced surface modeling), but core workflows are well-supported.