vk_post_user_36b98a5d1c92

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It discloses that authentication is required, that it is a raw proxy, and what the tool does (disables TOTP). However, it does not describe reversibility, response format, or potential side effects, leaving a moderate gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably sized but includes redundant phrasing ('Disable totp settings' / 'Disables any totp settings') and generic boilerplate about aliases and top-level fields that may not be relevant. It is not poorly structured but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers the core action, authentication, and payload passing. However, the optionality contradiction and lack of return-value/error info leave it incomplete. It is adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already fully describes the body parameter, so the baseline is 3. However, the description incorrectly calls the body field 'optional' while the schema marks it as required, which is a direct contradiction. The generic proxy notes about aliases and top-level fields add little value for this one-parameter tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Disable totp settings' and 'Disables any totp settings for the current user.' It also names the exact endpoint path, which distinguishes it from other user-related proxy tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool: to disable TOTP for the current user. It mentions authentication requirements and how to pass the payload, but does not explicitly state when not to use it or name alternatives. This is clear context without explicit exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.