vk_delete_teams_e7d740105b63

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses important side effects (revokes access via that team), a constraint (self-removal only if not the last user), that the endpoint usually needs no request body, and that authentication is required. It could mention admin permissions for removing others, but the provided behavioral context is substantive.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description front-loads the purpose clearly, but repeats 'Remove a user from a team.' verbatim, adding unnecessary length. The rest of the sentences are useful, but the duplication is wasteful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter delete operation with no output schema, the description covers purpose, side effects, parameter aliases, request body expectations, and auth. It leaves minor gaps (e.g., response format, permission to remove other users) but is generally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds value by noting that path and query parameters are top-level fields and that camelCase/snake_case aliases are accepted, which helps the agent construct calls correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Remove a user from a team') and identifies the exact REST endpoint (DELETE /teams/{id}/members/{username}), making it distinct from sibling tools like vk_delete_teams_0bdccd633612 (deleting a team) and vk_delete_task.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The purpose implies when to use, and the description includes a self-removal condition ('if they are not the last user'), but it does not explicitly compare against alternatives or state when not to use. No explicit exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.