vk_delete_projects_79232e6c95f0

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of behavioral disclosure. It does well by noting authentication is required, the endpoint usually requires no request body, and path/query parameters are top-level fields. It also explains alias conventions, adding meaningful context beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with the primary purpose and provides useful details in a compact form. However, 'Delets a user from a project' is redundant with the first sentence and contains a typo, preventing a perfect conciseness score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple DELETE operation with no output schema, the description covers the essential context: purpose, endpoint, effect, authentication, request body expectations, and parameter aliases. It does not mention error cases or return values, but these are less critical for this simple operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds value by explaining that path and query parameters are top-level fields and that original parameter names accept camelCase and snake_case aliases, which helps the agent understand how to provide the IDs correctly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Delete a user from a project.' It also names the exact REST endpoint DELETE /projects/{projectID}/users/{userID}, which clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools that delete full projects or other entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides clear context for when to use the tool: to remove a user's access to a project, stating 'The user won't have access to the project anymore.' It does not explicitly name alternatives or state when not to use it, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.