Skip to main content
Glama
shashwatgtm

impact-mcp

by shashwatgtm
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to impact-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • IMPACT Framework MCP Server

      shashwatgtm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides B2B positioning and messaging tools based on the IMPACT Framework, enabling analysis of champions, competitors, and value propositions to craft compelling messages and execute strategic audits.
      8
      26 npm
      MIT

    • craft-gtm-mcp

      shashwatgtm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      8 strategic GTM execution tools for founders, CMOs, and strategy leaders covering PMF assessment, launch planning, customer research, retention, partner programs, crisis management, and competitive intelligence.
      8
      24 npm
      MIT

    • revenue-enablement-mcp

      shashwatgtm
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Deal Strategy & Sales Enablement Engine - 12 tools for sales execution, deal management, and revenue acceleration.
      12
      23 npm
      1
      MIT

    • Biz Intelligence

      ezbiz-services
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Business intelligence toolkit that analyzes competitors, scores websites, builds customer personas, and conducts market research using real-time competitive data. 8 tools including SWOT analysis, pricing analysis, and local market intelligence.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct step in the IMPACT framework, from high-level methodology to specific competitive analysis, market selection, and messaging. There is no overlap or ambiguity between the tool purposes.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share the 'impact_' prefix, and most follow a clear verb_noun pattern (e.g., identify_champions, map_alternatives). The exception is 'full_audit', which uses an adjective_noun structure, creating a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for covering the IMPACT methodology without being overwhelming or too sparse. Each tool represents a logical phase of the process.

    Completeness5/5

    The toolkit offers end-to-end coverage: starting with the framework overview, then progressing through champion identification, competitive mapping, value proposition, market selection, messaging, execution, and concluding with a full audit. This leaves no obvious gaps for the intended workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources