Revit Model MCP

Overview Schema Source Related Servers Discussions Admin

List Catalog

revit_list_catalog

Read-onlyIdempotent

List catalog names for one Revit section—categories, family-types, levels, area schemes, views, worksets, phases, or parameters; check skipped entries to know if results are incomplete.

Instructions

List catalog names for one section: categories, family-types, levels, area-schemes, views, worksets, phases or parameters. A non-empty skipped list means the result is incomplete; skippedCount counts all skipped entries.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`section`	Yes
`document`	No	Title or file name substring of the target document; needed when several Revit instances run.
`process_id`	No	Revit process ID; takes precedence over document.
`timeout_seconds`	No	Seconds to wait for a result (default 120).
`pickup_timeout_seconds`	No	Seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up the job (default 300); unused over HTTP.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed11 schema fields changedv0.10.0Oct 14, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / document / description

Previous value: -"Case-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name. Reads require exactly one matching instance; omitted document requires exactly one running instance. Zero or multiple matches fail before publishing. revit_list_instances returns all matching instances, or all running instances when omitted."New value: +"Title or file name substring of the target document; needed when several Revit instances run."

removedInput schema / properties / document / title
```
Removed value: -"Document"
```

changedInput schema / properties / pickup_timeout_seconds / description

Previous value: -"Positive integer seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up a local or SSH job (300 when omitted); ignored over HTTP. A pickup timeout raises an error but the pending job may still execute later."New value: +"Seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up the job (default 300); unused over HTTP."

removedInput schema / properties / pickup_timeout_seconds / title
```
Removed value: -"Pickup Timeout Seconds"
```

changedInput schema / properties / process_id / description

Previous value: -"Exact positive Revit process ID. Takes precedence over document; if both are supplied they must agree."New value: +"Revit process ID; takes precedence over document."

removedInput schema / properties / process_id / title
```
Removed value: -"Process Id"
```
removedInput schema / properties / section / title
```
Removed value: -"Section"
```

changedInput schema / properties / timeout_seconds / description

Previous value: -"Positive integer seconds to wait for a result after pickup (120 when omitted); HTTP uses this as its response budget. Expiry raises an error, and increasing it does not override the add-in's execution limits."New value: +"Seconds to wait for a result (default 120)."

removedInput schema / properties / timeout_seconds / title
```
Removed value: -"Timeout Seconds"
```

removedInput schema / title

Removed value: -"revit_list_catalogArguments"

removedOutput schema / title

Removed value: -"revit_list_catalogDictOutput"

Changed2 schema fields changedv0.7.0Sep 30, 2026

changedInput schema / properties / document / description

Previous value: -"Case-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name; default null leaves requests unaddressed, so any instance may respond. Use a unique substring with multiple instances; revit_list_instances instead returns all matching instances, or all instances when omitted."New value: +"Case-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name. Reads require exactly one matching instance; omitted document requires exactly one running instance. Zero or multiple matches fail before publishing. revit_list_instances returns all matching instances, or all running instances when omitted."

addedInput schema / properties / process_id

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "integer"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "default": null,
+  "description": "Exact positive Revit process ID. Takes precedence over document; if both are supplied they must agree.",
+  "title": "Process Id"
+}

Changed3 schema fields changedv0.1.1Sep 15, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / document / description

Added value: +"Case-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name; default null leaves requests unaddressed, so any instance may respond. Use a unique substring with multiple instances; revit_list_instances instead returns all matching instances, or all instances when omitted."

addedInput schema / properties / pickup_timeout_seconds / description

Added value: +"Positive integer seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up a local or SSH job (300 when omitted); ignored over HTTP. A pickup timeout raises an error but the pending job may still execute later."

addedInput schema / properties / timeout_seconds / description

Added value: +"Positive integer seconds to wait for a result after pickup (120 when omitted); HTTP uses this as its response budget. Expiry raises an error, and increasing it does not override the add-in's execution limits."

First observedSep 15, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely non-obvious behavioral context: results may be incomplete, signalled by a non-empty skipped list, and skippedCount tallies skipped entries. That is useful disclosure beyond the structured fields, though nothing is said about pagination or truncation limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tightly packed sentences with no filler; the enumeration and the skipped-result caveat are both front-loaded and each earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return shape need not be restated, and the description covers section scope plus the skipped/skippedCount interpretation. For a five-parameter read-only listing tool with strong annotations this is close to complete, though it could say a word about how the document/process_id targeting interacts with the listing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 80% and the document/process_id/timeout parameters are already documented in the schema. The description's contribution is enumerating the legal 'section' values, which the schema leaves as a bare string with no enum - that is meaningful added semantics for the one required parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (list) and resource (catalog names) and enumerates the eight valid sections, which scopes the tool precisely enough to separate it from revit_list_views, revit_list_instances, and revit_list_relations. It does not, however, explicitly name any sibling or contrast itself with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by the section enumeration (you call it when you need to know what categories, levels, worksets, etc. exist), but there is no statement of when to prefer this over revit_document_info, revit_list_views, or revit_query_elements, and no prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server