Skip to main content
Glama
sharafutdinovdi

Revit Model MCP

Links Status

revit_links_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

Check RVT, CAD, and image link status before export or hand-over. Returns summary counts and per-link status, paths, and instance counts.

Instructions

Read RVT, CAD and image link status before an export or hand-over.

Returns data with summary counts and rvtLinks, cadLinks and images lists containing status, paths and instance counts. Each list is capped at 100 entries by ID without pagination; summary counts cover all entries. No links produce empty lists; per-entry failures appear in error with status Other. A missing active document, overall read failure or timeout raises an error; timeout partials are not returned.

If more than one Revit instance is running, document is required; otherwise any instance may respond.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
documentNoCase-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name; default null leaves requests unaddressed, so any instance may respond. Use a unique substring with multiple instances; revit_list_instances instead returns all matching instances, or all instances when omitted.
timeout_secondsNoPositive integer seconds to wait for a result after pickup (120 when omitted); HTTP uses this as its response budget. Expiry raises an error, and increasing it does not override the add-in's execution limits.
pickup_timeout_secondsNoPositive integer seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up a local or SSH job (300 when omitted); ignored over HTTP. A pickup timeout raises an error but the pending job may still execute later.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed3 schema fields changedv0.1.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / document / description
      Added value: +"Case-insensitive substring of the target active document title or file name; default null leaves requests unaddressed, so any instance may respond. Use a unique substring with multiple instances; revit_list_instances instead returns all matching instances, or all instances when omitted."
    • addedInput schema / properties / pickup_timeout_seconds / description
      Added value: +"Positive integer seconds to wait for the add-in to pick up a local or SSH job (300 when omitted); ignored over HTTP. A pickup timeout raises an error but the pending job may still execute later."
    • addedInput schema / properties / timeout_seconds / description
      Added value: +"Positive integer seconds to wait for a result after pickup (120 when omitted); HTTP uses this as its response budget. Expiry raises an error, and increasing it does not override the add-in's execution limits."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds substantial behavior beyond the readOnly/idempotent annotations: 100-entry cap per list, summary counts covering all entries, empty list behavior, per-entry failures reported as status Other, and timeout partials not returned. It also discloses multi-instance routing behavior, giving the agent a reliable mental model of edge cases.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is efficiently structured: purpose first, then return shape, then limits, then error behavior, then multi-instance special case. Every sentence carries useful information; there is no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only query tool with an existing output schema, the description covers the important non-obvious aspects: list cap, no pagination, empty-list behavior, failure statuses, timeout behavior, and multi-instance document requirements. Nothing an agent needs to call this correctly appears missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents all three parameters, including defaults and multi-instance behavior. The tool description mostly restates the document-required condition but adds no new parameter meaning beyond what the input schema provides, hence the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific verb and resource: 'Read RVT, CAD and image link status'. It also gives the operational context ('before an export or hand-over') and names the exact data groups returned, making it easy to distinguish from sibling tools like revit_list_relations or revit_model_health.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It clearly states when to use the tool ('before an export or hand-over') and gives multi-instance selection guidance: if more than one Revit instance is running, the document parameter is required. It does not enumerate alternatives or explicit exclusions, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.