copper-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| COPPER_MCP_TRANSPORT | No | Transport for MCP server (default: stdio) | stdio |
| COPPER_MCP_WORKSPACE | Yes | Absolute path to the workspace directory containing board files |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| server_infoA | Return server version, maturity, and implemented capabilities. |
| inspect_boardA | Inspect a .kicad_pcb file inside the configured workspace without modifying it. |
| run_board_drcA | Run fixed-argument KiCad DRC and return a privacy-preserving summary. |
| inspect_board_irA | Report whether a board converts to the supported Board IR and describe its structure. |
| preview_routeA | Preview one deterministic two-pin route candidate without modifying any file. |
| observe_board_sceneA | Observe a workspace board as a bounded, region-scoped Circuit Scene. |
| preview_placementA | Validate a proposed footprint placement against a board, without changing anything. |
| apply_candidateA | Apply a previewed route candidate to a board, replacing the file on disk. |
| validate_candidateB | Validate and normalize an immutable route-candidate manifest. |
| compare_candidatesB | Rank candidates with hard DRC and connectivity correctness first. |
| render_circuit_schematicA | Render validated Circuit Intent content into one private ephemeral KiCad resource. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| server_manifest | Expose stable server metadata as an MCP resource. |
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but the three board inspection tools (inspect_board, inspect_board_ir, observe_board_scene) could cause selection ambiguity for an agent looking to simply get board state. Descriptions are detailed, but names alone don't fully disambiguate them.
Predominantly verb_noun with consistent snake_case. Minor inconsistency: 'compare_candidates' is plural while 'validate_candidate' is singular, and 'server_info' is noun_noun instead of verb_noun, but overall pattern is predictable.
11 tools is well within the ideal range and each serves a distinct purpose in the board design workflow, from inspection to candidate preview/apply.
Core route preview/apply, DRC, and board inspection are covered. Placement can only be previewed, not applied, which is a notable but clearly documented gap. There is no direct board editing beyond route application, but the server's stated scope is intentionally limited.