Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to copper-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables constrained KiCad layout, autorouting orchestration, ECO revision analysis, and manufacturing evidence packaging through MCP tools and persistent engineering jobs with native DRC/ERC verification.
      25
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI agents end-to-end control of KiCad 9+ for rule checks, manufacturing exports, production-readiness certification, and live PCB editor control.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to analyze schematics, inspect PCBs, trace connections, validate designs, and generate embedded code for KiCad projects.
      39
      174
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides schematic/PCB analysis, authoring, and SPICE simulation through MCP, enabling direct KiCad file manipulation and verification without requiring KiCad for reading.
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server for AI agents to understand KiCad projects through progressive disclosure, providing compact summaries and drill-down tools for components, nets, traces, and ERC/DRC checks without blowing context budgets.
      7
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that analyzes, reviews, and exports KiCad 9 designs, with live board editing via IPC and a built-in design-review engine.
      47
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but the three board inspection tools (inspect_board, inspect_board_ir, observe_board_scene) could cause selection ambiguity for an agent looking to simply get board state. Descriptions are detailed, but names alone don't fully disambiguate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly verb_noun with consistent snake_case. Minor inconsistency: 'compare_candidates' is plural while 'validate_candidate' is singular, and 'server_info' is noun_noun instead of verb_noun, but overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well within the ideal range and each serves a distinct purpose in the board design workflow, from inspection to candidate preview/apply.

    Completeness4/5

    Core route preview/apply, DRC, and board inspection are covered. Placement can only be previewed, not applied, which is a notable but clearly documented gap. There is no direct board editing beyond route application, but the server's stated scope is intentionally limited.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive