Skip to main content
Glama
seunghyukchoe

copper-mcp

by seunghyukchoe
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to copper-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • McpApp

      krok1029
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local-first MCP server for AI-native software delivery, enabling structured specifications, human approval gates, controlled repository operations, verification evidence, review, and traceability.
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-audit-server

      joepangallo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables security auditing for MCP configurations and AI agents, including prompt injection testing, data flow tracing, and security policy generation.
      16
      MIT

    • local-mcp-toolbox

      chriswayneh
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A secure, local-first MCP server for read-only inspection and troubleshooting of development environments, exposing narrow, typed, auditable capabilities for repository inspection, log summarization, Docker review, and security scanning without granting unrestricted machine access.
      MIT

    • guardrails-mcp-server

      ExpertVagabond
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
      38
      1
      MIT

    • lazy-mcp-router

      naive000
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Safety-first local MCP tool gate with control plane, runtime security, and observability for managing MCP backends.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 11 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but the three board inspection tools (inspect_board, inspect_board_ir, observe_board_scene) could cause selection ambiguity for an agent looking to simply get board state. Descriptions are detailed, but names alone don't fully disambiguate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Predominantly verb_noun with consistent snake_case. Minor inconsistency: 'compare_candidates' is plural while 'validate_candidate' is singular, and 'server_info' is noun_noun instead of verb_noun, but overall pattern is predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    11 tools is well within the ideal range and each serves a distinct purpose in the board design workflow, from inspection to candidate preview/apply.

    Completeness4/5

    Core route preview/apply, DRC, and board inspection are covered. Placement can only be previewed, not applied, which is a notable but clearly documented gap. There is no direct board editing beyond route application, but the server's stated scope is intentionally limited.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources